VBench Video Generation Quality Assessment

# VBench Video Generation Quality Assessment Configuration
# Based on Huang et al., CVPR 2024
# Task: Rate and compare AI-generated video quality across multiple dimensions

annotation_task_name: "VBench Video Generation Quality Assessment"
task_dir: "."

# Data configuration
data_files:
  - sample-data.json
item_properties:
  id_key: "id"
  text_key: "video_url"

# Output
output_annotation_dir: "annotation_output/"
output_annotation_format: "json"

# Annotation schemes
annotation_schemes:
  # Temporal consistency rating
  - name: "temporal_consistency"
    description: |
      Rate the temporal consistency of the generated video.
      Consider: Do objects maintain their appearance across frames?
      Are there flickering artifacts or sudden appearance changes?
    annotation_type: likert
    size: 5
    min_label: "Very Inconsistent"
    max_label: "Very Consistent"
    labels:
      - "1 - Severe flickering, objects change drastically"
      - "2 - Noticeable inconsistencies across frames"
      - "3 - Some minor temporal artifacts"
      - "4 - Mostly consistent with rare artifacts"
      - "5 - Perfectly consistent throughout"

  # Motion smoothness rating
  - name: "motion_smoothness"
    description: |
      Rate the smoothness and naturalness of motion in the video.
      Consider: Are movements fluid? Are there jerky transitions?
      Do objects move in physically plausible ways?
    annotation_type: likert
    size: 5
    min_label: "Very Jerky"
    max_label: "Very Smooth"
    labels:
      - "1 - Extremely jerky, unnatural movement"
      - "2 - Frequently stuttering or abrupt motions"
      - "3 - Somewhat smooth with occasional issues"
      - "4 - Mostly smooth and natural motion"
      - "5 - Perfectly smooth, natural movement"

  # Aesthetic quality rating
  - name: "aesthetic_quality"
    description: |
      Rate the overall aesthetic quality of the generated video.
      Consider: Visual appeal, color harmony, composition, and artistic quality.
    annotation_type: likert
    size: 5
    min_label: "Very Poor"
    max_label: "Excellent"
    labels:
      - "1 - Very poor visual quality, unappealing"
      - "2 - Below average aesthetics"
      - "3 - Acceptable visual quality"
      - "4 - Good aesthetic quality"
      - "5 - Excellent, visually impressive"

  # Text-video alignment rating
  - name: "text_alignment"
    description: |
      Rate how well the generated video matches the text prompt.
      Consider: Are all elements from the prompt present?
      Does the video accurately depict the described scene?
    annotation_type: likert
    size: 5
    min_label: "No Match"
    max_label: "Perfect Match"
    labels:
      - "1 - Completely unrelated to prompt"
      - "2 - Vaguely related but misses key elements"
      - "3 - Partially matches the prompt"
      - "4 - Mostly matches with minor omissions"
      - "5 - Perfectly depicts the prompt"

  # Pairwise comparison
  - name: "pairwise_preference"
    description: |
      Compare Video A and Video B generated from the same prompt.
      Which video is better overall? Consider all quality dimensions.
    annotation_type: pairwise
    labels:
      - name: "Video A is much better"
        key_value: "1"
      - name: "Video A is slightly better"
        key_value: "2"
      - name: "About the same"
        key_value: "3"
      - name: "Video B is slightly better"
        key_value: "4"
      - name: "Video B is much better"
        key_value: "5"

  # Temporal quality marking
  - name: "quality_segments"
    description: |
      Mark any temporal segments where quality notably drops or improves.
      Use this to flag specific moments of artifacts or excellence.
    annotation_type: "video_annotation"
    mode: "segment"
    labels:
      - name: "quality_drop"
        color: "#EF4444"
        key_value: "d"
      - name: "quality_peak"
        color: "#22C55E"
        key_value: "p"
      - name: "artifact"
        color: "#F59E0B"
        key_value: "a"
    frame_stepping: true
    show_timecode: true
    playback_rate_control: true

# User configuration
allow_all_users: true

# Task assignment
instances_per_annotator: 30
annotation_per_instance: 3

# Instructions
annotation_instructions: |
  ## VBench Video Generation Quality Assessment Task

  Your goal is to evaluate the quality of AI-generated videos on multiple dimensions.

  ### Quality Dimensions to Rate (1-5 scale):

  **Temporal Consistency:**
  - Do objects maintain their appearance across frames?
  - Are there flickering or morphing artifacts?

  **Motion Smoothness:**
  - Are movements fluid and natural?
  - Are there jerky or physically impossible motions?

  **Aesthetic Quality:**
  - Is the video visually appealing?
  - Consider color, composition, and overall look

  **Text-Video Alignment:**
  - Does the video match the given text prompt?
  - Are all described elements present?

  ### Pairwise Comparison:
  - When two videos are shown, compare them holistically
  - Consider all quality dimensions together

  ### Temporal Quality Marking:
  - Flag specific moments where quality drops (red)
  - Mark segments of exceptional quality (green)
  - Highlight visible artifacts (yellow)

  ### Tips:
  - Watch each video at least twice before rating
  - Pay attention to edges and fine details for artifacts
  - Compare motion to real-world physics
  - Read the prompt carefully before rating alignment